Reclamation District 817 Gibbs Pond and 40 Mile Road Pipe Repair Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2021110450
Lead Agency
Reclamation District 817
(RD817)
Document Title
Reclamation District 817 Gibbs Pond and 40 Mile Road Pipe Repair Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/25/2022
Document Description
Reclamation District (RD) 817 proposes to replace two gravity-flow pipes that provide storm drain and irrigation drainage through the northern levee of Dry Creek in Yuba County, California. The project is located where 40 Mile Road crosses the Dry Creek north levee approximately 2.75 miles east of State Route 70 and 3 miles west of the Town of Wheatland. The Gibbs Pond and 40 Mile Road Pipe Repair Project (project) will be funded with a combination of local funds (provided by the RD 817 through a grant agreement with Yuba Water Agency) and an existing project agreement between the RD and the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) under the Flood System Repair Program (FSRP).
Contact Information
Name
Tom Engler
Agency Name
RD817 District
Job Title
District Engineer
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Email
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Yuba
Regions
Citywide, Countywide, Statewide
Cross Streets
40 Mile Road at Dry Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Reclamation District 817
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Yuba
Final Environmental Document Available at
CEQAnet - https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2021110450
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes