Interstate 10 Replace Rock Slope Protection (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-RIV-24454-R6)
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2020059014
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 8
(DOT)
Document Title
Interstate 10 Replace Rock Slope Protection (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-RIV-24454-R6)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/29/2022
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number EPIMS RIV-24454-R6, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, California Department of Transportation District 8. The project is limited to the replacement of rock slope protection (RSP) along both banks of the 12 ephemeral washes at bridge abutments including median areas between east- and west-bound bridges and partially grout the
new RSP.
Contact Information
Name
Jason Bill
Agency Name
Fish and Wildlife, Region 6
Job Title
Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Riverside
Regions
Southern California
Other Location Info
The project is located at 12 separate ephemeral streams along Interstate 10,
between the communities of Chiriaco Summit and Desert Center, in the Chuckwalla Valley, in the County of
Riverside.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Fish and Wildlife, Region 6
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Riverside
Final Environmental Document Available at
California Department of Transportation District 8
464 W. 4th St., 8th Floor, MS 833
San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No