Winship Avenue Bridge Replacement Project
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2020019008
Lead Agency
Town of Ross
Document Title
Winship Avenue Bridge Replacement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/25/2020
Present Land Use
Existing bridge and roadway. Surrounding area residential
Document Description
The Town of Ross Public Works Department (Town) proposes to replace the existing Winship Avenue Bridge (No. 27C0074) over San Anselmo Creek, which is required to ensure current safety and design standards for bridges and roadways are maintained. As part of the project, the Ross Valley Sanitary District (RVSD will relocate and update the existing 6-inch gravity sewer line that is currently within the existing bridge deck. The primary objective of the sewer line upgrade is to relieve hydraulic and structural deficiencies with aging RVSD infrastructure within the town of Ross.
Contact Information
Name
Richard Simonitch
Agency Name
Town of Ross Department of Public Works
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Town of Ross Public Works Department
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Ross
Counties
Marin
Regions
Citywide
Cross Streets
Sir Francis Drake Boulevard
Zip
94957
Total Acres
less than 1 acre
State Highways
California
Waterways
San Anselmo Creek
Township
Ross
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Town of Ross Department of Public Works
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes