Dimitar Dimitrov Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-TRI-17560-R1
216 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2018122049
Lead Agency
Trinity County
Document Title
Dimitar Dimitrov Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-TRI-17560-R1
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/10/2024
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (EPIMS-TRI-17560-R1) pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1602, to the project Applicant, Dimitar Dimitrov.
The project is limited to four Projects, 1) the removal of an existing seep well diversion on an intermittent stream, 2) use of an existing seep well diversion on an intermittent stream for fire suppression, 3) installation of an overflow spillway structure on an existing impoundment of an intermittent stream, and 4) the replacement of one existing culvert located on an ephemeral stream.
Contact Information
Name
Dyana Judnick
Agency Name
CDFW
Job Title
Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Name
Drew Plebani
Agency Name
Trinity County
Job Title
Division Director
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Hayfork
Counties
Trinity
Regions
Northern California
Parcel #
017-010-69-00
Township
31N
Range
11W
Section
1
Base
Mt. D
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Trinity
Final Environmental Document Available at
https://www.trinitycounty.org/node/2609
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes