Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Project Phase 2B (Azusa to Montclair)
16 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010121069
Lead Agency
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
Document Title
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Project Phase 2B (Azusa to Montclair)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/11/2019
Document Description
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension -Azusa to Montclair project (Project). Modifications to the Project ("Project Modifications") consisting of constructing and operating the Project in three phases, rather than two phases; implementing a new mitigation measure that re-stripes the traffic lanes on White Avenue in the City of La Verne (between 1st Street and 6th Street) to include two lanes in the northbound direction and one lane in the southbound direction, including a dedicated median turn lane, changes to the track alignment in the City of Glendora, and transportation circulation improvements as described in the Final Supplemental EIR.
Contact Information
Name
Lisa Levy Buch
Agency Name
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Azusa, San Bernardino
Counties
Los Angeles, San Bernardino
Other Location Info
The project would provide Light Rail Transit (LRT) service from the City of Azusa in Los Angeles County to the City of Montclair in San Bernardino County.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes