Railroad Avenue Station Area Specific Plan Implementation Action: Public Storage Redevelopment Project, AP-18-1315 (RZ)
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008102003
Lead Agency
City of Pittsburg
Document Title
Railroad Avenue Station Area Specific Plan Implementation Action: Public Storage Redevelopment Project, AP-18-1315 (RZ)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/24/2019
Document Description
The Railroad Avenue Specific Plan (RASP), adopted by the Pittsburg City Council in 2009, is intended to guide all new development in key subareas located roughly within a 1/2-mile radius of the planned BART station at Railroad Avenue and State Route 4. The RASP established new land use classifications, development policies and guidelines, planned community resources, transportation and circulation improvements, implementation strategies, and phasing recommendations for properties located within the RASP area.
See NOD for full details.
Contact Information
Name
Kristin Pollot
Agency Name
City of Pitsburg Planning Division
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Mark Kennedy, Public Storage, Inc.
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Pittsburg
Counties
Contra Costa
Cross Streets
525 California Avenue, Pittsburg CA 94565.
Parcel #
073-270-088
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Pittsburg
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes