Strand Ranch Integrated Banking Project Final Environmental Impact Report Addendum No. 2
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007041080
Lead Agency
Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District
Document Title
Strand Ranch Integrated Banking Project Final Environmental Impact Report Addendum No. 2
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/10/2016
Present Land Use
Intensive Agriculture and Exclusive Agriculture
Document Description
Irvine Ranch Water District has prepared Addendum No. 2 to the FEIR for the Strand Ranch Integrated Banking Project. The Final EIR included development of groundwater banking facilities on Strand Ranch for use by IRWD and Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District, the lead agency. Modifications which are part of Addendum No. 2 include elimination of the restriction of a combined recovery rate of 36 cubic feet per second from both onsite and offsite wells. The modifications would not change the annual extraction limit of 17,500 acre ft per year for IRWD. The modification would allow simultaneous operation of all wells onsite at Strand Ranch and the three offsite wells.
Contact Information
Name
Paul Weghorst
Agency Name
Irvine Ranch Water District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Stockdale Hwy and Enos Lane (Hwy 43)
Zip
93312
Total Acres
~600
Parcel #
160-010-02, 160-010-03, 160-010-07, 160-010-21, 160-010-22
State Highways
58, 43, 119
Railways
Sante Fe RR
Waterways
Kern River
Township
30S
Range
25E
Section
2
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Rosedale
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Irvine Ranch Water District
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.